Key result
CIED infections occur at a ~1.5% overall rate, with higher risk in defibrillators and CRTs.
Observational (n=3,158)
No
CIED infection rates in this Portuguese center were low (1.48%) but higher for complex devices, with good prognosis following standard extraction and antibiotic therapy.
Supports targeted prevention in complex CIEDs; extends single-center data but leaves generalizability open.
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device infections has increased significantly over the years and they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology in the Central region of Portugal is not known. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To characterize cardiac implantable electronic device infections through a retrospective study of 3158 patients admitted to our center between January 2008 and September 2014 and to review the subject in the light of the current state of the art. RESULTS: The infection rate was 1.48% (pacemakers 1.21%, cardiac defibrillator/resynchronization devices 5.40%). The study population consisted of 47 patients with a mean age of 65±19 years, predominantly male (72.3%). Infections were mainly of pacemakers, the main device implanted in our population (n=2954), and most occurred late after first implantation. Clinically, most patients presented with fever and local inflammation. Blood cultures identified mainly Gram-positive microorganisms. Empiric antibiotic therapy with vancomycin was instituted in all patients, associated with gentamicin in 57%. The device was extracted in the majority of cases (72%). During follow-up (32±22 months) eight patients died (17%), seven of cardiovascular cause (15%), and seven were readmitted with device infection (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Our rate of infection was low, similar to other published series, with a higher rate in cardiac defibrillator/resynchronization devices. After standard treatment with antibiotic therapy and device extraction, the prognosis was good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernandes et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device infections (n=3,158). Cardiac implantable electronic device infection occurred at an overall rate of 1.48%, with higher rates in defibrillator/resynchronization devices (5.40%) compared to pacemakers (1.21%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: