PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2003European Heart Journal175 citationsOpen Access

Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis 2 years after radiofrequency catheter ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation

View Full Paper
TAThomas Arentz

Structured PICO

Does radiofrequency catheter ablation cause pulmonary vein stenosis in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
n=47 patients with refractory and highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation
I
Intervention
Radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmogenic triggers inside the pulmonary veins and/or ostial pulmonary vein isolation with conventional mapping and ablation technology
O
Outcome
Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis or occlusion evaluated by transoesophageal doppler-echo and/or angio magnetic resonance imaging at 2 yearssafety

Radiofrequency catheter ablation using conventional technology carries a 28% risk of significant pulmonary vein stenosis at 2 years, with distal ablations posing a substantially higher risk than ostial ablations.

Abstract

AIMS: Pulmonary vein ablation offers the potential to cure patients with atrial fibrillation. In this study, we investigated the incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency catheter ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation by systematic long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with refractory and highly symptomatic atrial fibrillation underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmogenic triggers inside the pulmonary veins and/or ostial pulmonary vein isolation with conventional mapping and ablation technology. These patients had follow-up examinations at 2 years with transoesophageal doppler-echo and/or angio magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of the pulmonary veins. Seventy-seven percent of the patients were free from atrial fibrillation, 51% were without antiarrhythmic drugs, and 26% were on previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drug therapy. However, 13 of the 47 patients showed significant pulmonary vein stenosis or occlusion. Only three of these 13 patients complained of dyspnoea. Distal ablations inside the pulmonary vein were associated with a 5.6-fold higher risk of stenosis than ostial ablations. CONCLUSIONS: At 2-year follow-up, the risk of significant pulmonary vein stenosis/occlusion after radiofrequency catheter ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation with conventional mapping and ablation technology was 28%. Distal ablations inside smaller pulmonary veins should be avoided because of the higher risk of stenosis than ablation at the ostium.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas Arentz (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee78d1c5e2d2319fa1070https://doi.org/10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00002-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper