Why the study?
Both the mTOR pathway and aldosterone contribute to cardiovascular and renal disease, but the interaction between aldosterone and mTOR signaling remains unknown.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
Male mice
Comparison
Physiologic increase in aldosterone vs pathophysiologic aldosterone levels
Design
Animal experimental study
Follow-up
3 weeks
Hypothesis-generating for aldosterone-mTOR signaling in heart and kidney; leaves open clinical relevance in cardiorenal disease.
Both mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and aldosterone are implicated in the development of cardiovascular and renal disease. However, the interaction between aldosterone and the mTOR pathway is unknown. We hypothesized the following: that (i) increased aldosterone will modulate the activity of the mTORC1 and mTORC2 molecular pathways in the heart and kidney; (ii) a physiologic increase in aldosterone will affect these pathways differently than a pathophysiologic one; and (iii) the changes in the mTOR level/activity will differ between the heart and kidney. In both kidney and heart tissues, phosphorylation of mTOR is significantly decreased when aldosterone levels are physiologically increased (by dietary sodium restriction), followed by a decrease in phosphorylated p70S6K1 in cardiac, but not renal, tissue. Sirtuin 1, an epigenetic modulator, is decreased in the heart but increased in the kidney. Conversely, pathophysiologic aldosterone levels (an infusion for 3 weeks) had divergent effects on phosphorylated mTOR and the downstream substrates of mTORC1 and mTORC2 in cardiac and renal tissues. Increased aldosterone levels significantly alter mTOR activity in the heart and kidney. In the kidney, substantial differences were noted if the increase was produced physiologically vs pathophysiologically, suggesting that mTOR activity, in part, may mediate aldosterone-induced renal damage. Thus, modulating mTOR activity may reduce aldosterone-dependent renal damage similar to mineralocorticoid receptor blockade but potentially with less adverse side effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brooks et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: