What question did this study set out to answer?

To identify and examine the strategic operating models adopted by supreme audit institutions using the framework of professional competition theory.

April 3, 2017Financial Accountability and Management

The Strategic Options of Supreme Audit Institutions: The Case of Four Nordic Countries

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To identify and examine the strategic operating models adopted by supreme audit institutions using the framework of professional competition theory.
Conducted a qualitative comparative case study examining national audit offices across four Nordic countries.
Categorized organizational operations across four theoretical models: financial auditing, performance auditing, portfolio, and hybrid strategies.
Three of the four investigated supreme audit institutions adopted a portfolio strategy, combining diverse auditing activities with minor institutional variations.
One supreme audit institution implemented a hybrid strategy, integrating distinct audit functions into unified practices.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Comparative case study reveals prevalent portfolio and hybrid strategies across four Nordic supreme audit institutions, highlighting diverse approaches to public accountability.

Cite This Study

Jeppesen et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee8bd25c30b2cc7f9e91b https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12118

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Comparative case study reveals prevalent portfolio and hybrid strategies across four Nordic supreme audit institutions, highlighting diverse approaches to public accountability.

The Strategic Options of Supreme Audit Institutions: The Case of Four Nordic Countries

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

The Strategic Options of Supreme Audit Institutions: The Case of Four Nordic Countries

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider