This article examines the role of fairness in software across diverse application contexts, with a particular emphasis on healthcare, and introduces the concept of algorithmic (individual) meta-fairness. We argue that attaining a high degree of fairness—under any interpretation of its meaning—necessitates higher-level consideration. We analyze the factors that may guide the choice of a fairness definition or bias metric depending on the context, and we propose a framework that additionally highlights quality criteria such as accountability, accuracy, and explainability, as these play a crucial role from the perspective of individual fairness. A detailed analysis of requirements and applications in healthcare forms the basis for the development of this framework. The framework is illustrated through two examples: (i) a specific application to a predictive model for reliable lower bounds of BRCA1/2 mutation probabilities using Dempster–Shafer theory, and (ii) a more conceptual application to digital, feature-oriented healthcare twins, with the focus on bias in communication and collaboration. Throughout the article, we present a curated selection of the relevant literature at the intersection of ethics, medicine, and modern digital society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luther et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: