Key result
Planned interventions based on estimates of fetal weight do not reduce the incidence of shoulder dystocia or decrease adverse outcomes attributable to fetal macrosomia.
Why the study?
Do planned interventions based on estimates of fetal weight decrease adverse perinatal outcomes in the management of macrosomia?
Do planned interventions based on estimates of fetal weight decrease adverse perinatal outcomes in the management of macrosomia?
Estimating fetal weight to plan interventions does not reduce the incidence of shoulder dystocia or adverse perinatal outcomes.
Supports avoiding fetal weight-based interventions in macrosomia; confirms no benefit and leaves open better risk-stratification tools.
The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence that, including estimates of fetal macrosomia in patient care, will decrease adverse perinatal outcomes. A literature search for the years 1980 to 1999 was used. Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injuries occur more often in macrosomic than in nonmacrosomic neonates. However, 26 to 58 percent of shoulder dystocias and 24 to 44 percent of brachial plexus injuries occur to babies weighing less than 4000 gm. Persistence of impairment is extremely rare. Neither historical nor clinical factors have strong positive predictive values for macrosomia. From 15 to 81 percent of the babies predicted to be macrosomic are confirmed by birth weight. Of babies determined to be macrosomic at birth, only 50 to 100 percent were successfully predicted. Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injuries are unpredictable events. Available evidence suggests that planned interventions based on estimates of fetal weight do not reduce the incidence of shoulder dystocia and do not decrease adverse outcomes attributable to fetal macrosomia. Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to identify the factors associated with fetal macrosomia, list the factors that can affect the estimation of fetal weight, and compare the various methods used to estimate fetal weight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sacks et al. (2000) conducted a review in Fetal macrosomia. Planned interventions based on estimates of fetal weight was evaluated on Incidence of shoulder dystocia and adverse outcomes attributable to fetal macrosomia. Planned interventions based on estimates of fetal weight do not reduce the incidence of shoulder dystocia or decrease adverse outcomes attributable to fetal macrosomia.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: