The detection of financial fraud has become an increasingly critical concern in today's data-driven economy, necessitating the development and application of robust analytical methods.This research undertakes a comparative analysis of various clustering techniques, specifically partitioning methods such as k-means, k-medoids, CLARA, CLARANS, BIRCH, and density-based algorithms like DBSCAN and OPTICS, alongside hierarchical clustering methods.By evaluating these algorithms, the study aims to identify the most effective method for un-covering patterns indicative of fraudulent activities within financial datasets.To gauge the performance of these clustering techniques, several evaluation metrics will be employed, including the Rand Index, Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), silhouette coefficient, and Davies-Bouldin Index (DBI).The Rand Index serves as a foundational measure for assessing clustering efficacy by quantifying agreement between predicted and true clusters.The ARI enhances this evaluation by accounting for chance agreements, thereby providing a more nuanced understanding of clustering performance.The silhouette coefficient offers insights into the cohesion and separation of clusters, while the DBI assesses cluster quality by evaluating intra-cluster and inter-cluster distances.This comprehensive analysis not only aims to determine the optimal clustering method for financial fraud detection but also seeks to contribute to the broader field of unsupervised machine learning.By systematically comparing the strengths and weaknesses of various clustering approaches, this research endeavours to provide valuable insights and guidelines for practitioners in the finance sector, enhancing their ability to detect and mitigate fraudulent activities effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: