Why the study?
Depression is a possible risk factor for incident AF, but previous investigations have yielded controversial results.
Does depression or the use of antidepressants increase the risk of incident atrial fibrillation?
Does depression or the use of antidepressants increase the risk of incident atrial fibrillation?
Depression and the use of antidepressants are both associated with an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation.
Supports AF monitoring in depressed patients on antidepressants; extends observational evidence linking mood disorders to arrhythmia risk.
Background Depression is a possible influence factor for the increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF). Although several investigations have assessed their association, the results are still controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between depression or using antidepressants and AF. Methods We systemically performed the literature retrieval from two electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE until March 2022 to extract relevant data. The hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (OR) from included studies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adjusted into the risk ratio (RR) and pooled by using the random-effects model. Results Totally 9 studies about the associations between depression or antidepressants and incident AF risk were included in this meta-analysis. Among them, 5 studies specifically analyzed the impact of antidepressants on the risk of AF. The outcomes of our analysis indicated that depression or depressive symptoms could increase AF risk (RR = 1.15, 95% CI, 1.03–1.27, P < 0.01). In addition, the use of antidepressants can also increase AF risk (RR = 1.16, 95% CI, 1.07–1.25, P < 0.001). These results remained unchanged when we remove the source of heterogeneity or adjust the analysis model into the fixed-effects model. Conclusions Based on existing investigations, both depression and the use of antidepressants are closely related to the increase of incident AF risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: