Key result
Conduction system pacing provides a physiological alternative to RVP by bypassing electrical lesions.
Why the study?
Conventional right ventricular apical pacing may cause adverse outcomes, motivating the evaluation of conduction system pacing modalities that maintain physiologic ventricular activation.
Does conduction system pacing improve outcomes compared to conventional right ventricular apical pacing?
Does conduction system pacing improve outcomes compared to conventional right ventricular apical pacing?
Conduction system pacing offers a physiological alternative to right ventricular apical pacing, but further evidence is needed to overcome current limitations and support strong guideline recommendations.
Should not yet change practice for ventricular pacing; leaves open whether conduction system pacing improves outcomes versus right ventricular apical pacing.
Conduction system pacing is an alternative practice to conventional right ventricular apical pacing. It is a method that maintains physiologic ventricular activation, based on a correct pathophysiological basis, in which the pacing lead bypasses the lesion of the electrical fibers, and the electrical impulse transmits through the intact adjacent conduction system. For this reason, it might reasonably characterized by the term “electrical bypass” compared to the coronary artery bypass in revascularization therapy. In this review reference is made to the sequence of events that conventional right ventricular pacing may cause adverse outcomes. Furthermore, there is a reference to alternative strategies and pacing sites. Interest focuses on the modalities for which there is data from the literature, namely for the Right Ventricular (RV) septal pacing, the His Bunde pacing (HBP), and the Left Bundle Branch pacing (LBBP). A more extensive reference is about the HBP, for which there are the most updating data. We analyze the considerations that limit HBP wide application in three axes, and we also present the data for the implantation and follow-up of these patients. Then, the indications with their most important studies to date are described in detail, not only in their undoubtedly positive findings but also in their weak aspects, because of which, this pacing mode has not yet received a strong recommendation for implementation. Finally, there is a report on LBBP, focusing mainly on its points of differentiation from HBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sdogkos et al. (2023) conducted a review in Conduction system pacing. Conduction system pacing vs. Conventional right ventricular apical pacing was evaluated. Conduction system pacing, including His bundle and left bundle branch pacing, offers a physiological alternative to conventional right ventricular pacing by bypassing electrical lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: