Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Smishing, or SMS-based phishing, remains a significant threat to mobile users due to its use of concise and emotionally manipulative language. These messages often rely on psychological cues and high-risk phrases that are not fully captured by traditional feature engineering. This study proposes an improved smishing detection framework that adds emotion-based labels and phrase-level risk indicators to embedding-based models. We used GPT-4.5 to annotate emotional dimensions. We also extracted targeted phrasal indicators based on known smishing patterns. Experiments on a unified dataset of over 22000 SMS messages show that combining emotion-based and phrase-level features consistently improves classification accuracy. For example, in Logistic Regression with TF-IDF, accuracy increased from 0.9186 to 0.9221 after adding both types of features. Gradient Boosting with TF-IDF showed the largest performance gain, while Random Forest achieved the highest absolute accuracy in this setting (0.9432). For Word2Vec embeddings, similar patterns were observed: Logistic Regression improved the most (from 0.8721 to 0.8817), while XGBoost reached the highest overall accuracy (0.9447) with sentiment-enhanced input. However, in some cases, risk-based features led to a slight drop in performance, suggesting potential feature noise in highly optimized or shallow models. These findings indicate that combining emotion-driven and pattern-based features with classical embeddings enhances phishing detection performance, particularly in short messages where traditional methods may lack context awareness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krawczyk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: