Key result
ViV TAVI successfully treats severe regurgitation from early degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses in 3 high-risk patients.
Why the study?
Concerns have emerged regarding early Mitroflow bioprosthesis deterioration with prevalent stenosis, but pure severe aortic regurgitation from early and mid-term degeneration needed reporting.
Does Valve-in-Valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV TAVI) improve outcomes in high surgical risk patients with severe aortic regurgitation due to early degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses?
Case Report (n=3)
No
Does Valve-in-Valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV TAVI) improve outcomes in high surgical risk patients with severe aortic regurgitation due to early degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses?
Valve-in-Valve TAVI is a safe and effective therapeutic option for high-risk patients presenting with severe aortic regurgitation due to early degeneration of Mitroflow bioprostheses.
Case series supports ViV TAVI feasibility in high-risk Mitroflow degeneration; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in larger studies.
Valve-in-Valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV TAVI) is emerging as an effective therapeutic option for bioprosthetic valve failure. Recently, concern has been raised for early valve deterioration of Mitroflow (Sorin) aortic bioprosthesis, with the development of prevalent stenosis. We report cases of pure severe aortic regurgitation (AR) due to early and mid-term prosthesis degeneration. From June 2018 to October 2019, three patients were treated in our division for the new appearance of severe intraprosthetic regurgitation. Patient 1 (man, 85-year-old) and patient 3 (woman, 83-year-old) had a Mitroflow n. 25 and n. 21 implanted, respectively, in 2012 and 2013 for severe aortic stenosis. Patient 2, a 67-year-old woman with Marfan syndrome underwent a Mitroflow n. 25 implant in 2008 for severe AR and presented chronic type-B aortic dissection. Patient 1 was diagnosed with severe AR in the ambulatory setting, while the other patients presented acute heart failure, requiring inotrope support and high doses intravenous diuretics, and in case 3, temporary extracorporeal ultrafiltration. All patients appeared at high surgical risk and were successfully treated with ViV TAVI, through the right axillary artery in patient 2, and through the femoral artery in patients 1 and 3. Results were good at short- and mid-term follow-up. In conclusion, early and midterm bioprosthesis degeneration with the development of severe AR is a possible complication of the Mitroflow aortic valve. ViV TAVI has been confirmed as a safe and effective therapeutic option in our cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pernigo et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Severe aortic regurgitation of early degenerated Mitroflow bioprosthesis (n=3). Valve-in-Valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV TAVI) was evaluated on Procedural success and clinical improvement. Valve-in-Valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation successfully treated three high-surgical-risk patients presenting with severe intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation due to early degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: