Key result
Ivabradine cuts NT-proBNP by ~37% and lowers neopterin vs placebo in chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Heart rate reduction is a cornerstone in heart failure therapy, but the short-term effects of ivabradine on NT-Pro BNP and neopterin and their association with heart rate needed evaluation.
Does ivabradine reduce NT-Pro BNP and neopterin levels in patients with chronic systolic heart failure?
RCT (n=60)
Double-blind
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does ivabradine reduce NT-Pro BNP and neopterin levels in patients with chronic systolic heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 728.33% vs 1152.87%
p-value: p=<0.001
May reduce biomarkers in chronic HF without practice change; leaves open clinical outcome benefits.
PURPOSE: Heart rate reduction (HR) is a cornerstone in heart failure therapy as it improves patient outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate short-term effect of ivabradine on NT-Pro BNP and neopterin in heart failure patients and assess the association between HR and these biomarkers. METHODS: Sixty patients on standard heart failure therapy were randomly allocated into ivabradine group (n = 30) and non-ivabradine group (n = 30). Ivabradine 5 mg twice daily was given for 3 months. Lipid profile and kidney functions were performed and blood samples for NT-Pro BNP and neopterin were analysed at baseline and after 3 months of intervention in both groups. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in NYHA class in ivabradine group (p < 0.001). Ejection fraction was improved in ivabradine and non-ivabradine groups after intervention (p < 0.001), with a greater improvement in ivabradine group (p = 0.026). Heart rate was reduced in ivabradine group (p < 0.001) and non-ivabradine group (p < 0.001) yet greater reduction was seen in ivabradine group (p < 0.001). Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were reduced in ivabradine group (Scr: p = 0.001, BUN: p = 0.001). NT-Pro BNP and neopterin levels significantly decreased in ivabradine group (NT-Pro BNP: p < 0.001, neopterin p < 0.001). Significant positive correlation was found between HR and biomarker levels after intervention (NT-Pro BNP: r = 0.475, p < 0.001, neopterin: r = 0.384, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Ivabradine therapy reduced levels of both biomarkers which correlated well with HR. Biomarker levels might provide a tool for assessing ivabradine effectiveness in HF. Trial registration Date: June 26, 2020. Identifier: NCT04448899. Link: Ivabradine in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure-Full Text View-ClinicalTrials.gov.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dogheim et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (n=60). Ivabradine vs. Placebo was evaluated on NT-Pro BNP level at 3 months (pg/ml) (p=<0.001). Ivabradine significantly reduced NT-Pro BNP and neopterin levels compared to placebo in patients with chronic heart failure after 3 months of treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: