Key result
LBBP shows similar rates of significant troponin elevation compared to other EP procedures.
Why the study?
LBBP has emerged as an alternative to His bundle pacing, but the extent of myocardial injury during permanent LBBP implantation is not known.
Does left bundle branch pacing cause more myocardial injury (assessed by troponin release) compared to other standard electrophysiology procedures?
Observational (n=204)
Does left bundle branch pacing cause more myocardial injury (assessed by troponin release) compared to other standard electrophysiology procedures?
Asymptomatic troponin release following left bundle branch pacing is comparable to or less than that seen with other standard electrophysiology procedures, though higher than His bundle pacing.
Comparable troponin elevation after LBBP versus other EP procedures should not yet change practice; leaves open long-term outcome implications.
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative to His bundle pacing (HBP) to achieve physiologic ventricular stimulation. The extent of myocardial injury during permanent LBBP implantation is currently not known. The aim of the study was to prospectively assess the extent of myocardial injury during LBBP implantation. Cardiac troponin (cTn) levels were measured at baseline and 6-12 h following permanent LBBP. The number of attempts to achieve LBBP was documented. Troponin levels were measured in a control population undergoing other electrophysiology procedures including HBP, other devices involving right ventricular (RV) pacing, radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Significant elevation of troponin (SET) was defined as threefold increase above the upper reference limit (URL) for cTn. Between December 2019 and April 2020, 204 were prospectively enrolled: LBBP in 98 and Control group 106 (SVT, 55; AF, 20; HBP, 17; other devices, 14). SET (>3× URL) was seen in 49.4% of patients in the LBBP group compared to 58.4% in the control group (p = .23). Peak troponin levels were greater in the control group compared to the LBBP group (230.3 ± 320.1 vs. 87.4 ± 71.3 pg/ml; p = .0001). Compared to LBBP (49.4%), SET was observed less frequently following HBP (17.5%; p = .01), and other device implantation (29%; p = .15). Patients requiring >2 attempts (n = 33) had significantly higher incidence of SET compared to <2 attempts (n = 56; 66.7% vs. 39.3%; p = .01). LBBP implantation is associated with myocardial injury. Asymptomatic troponin release following LBBP is less than or comparable to other interventional electrophysiology procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ponnusamy et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing permanent left bundle branch pacing or other electrophysiology procedures (n=204). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) vs. Other electrophysiology procedures (SVT, AF, HBP, other devices) was evaluated on Significant elevation of troponin (SET) defined as threefold increase above the upper reference limit (p=.23). Left bundle branch pacing resulted in significant elevation of troponin in 49.4% of patients, comparable to the 58.4% observed in patients undergoing other electrophysiology procedures (p=0.23).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: