Key result
Discontinuing OAC after persistent AF ablation is linked to ~51% fewer bleeding events versus continuation.
Why the study?
Guidelines recommend continuing oral anticoagulants after catheter ablation for AF based on thromboembolic risk, but whether they can be discontinued in low-thromboembolic-risk patients remains unclear.
Does oral anticoagulant discontinuation reduce bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and CHADS2 score ≤2 after catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=427)
Does oral anticoagulant discontinuation reduce bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and CHADS2 score ≤2 after catheter ablation?
Effect estimate: adjusted HR 2.04 (for continuation) (95% CI 1.14-3.65)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.32% vs 7.54%
p-value: p=0.016
Discontinuation of oral anticoagulants within 1 year after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with a CHADS2 score ≤2 is associated with fewer bleeding and thromboembolic events compared to continuation.
May reduce bleeding after ablation in low-risk persistent AF; leaves open net benefit in observational data.
Abstract Background Guidelines state that oral anticoagulants (OACs) should be continued after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) based on thromboembolic risk stratification, regardless of procedural results. However, whether OACs could be discontinued in low-thromboembolic-risk patients remains unclear. Methods This was a retrospective follow-up study from the EARNEST-PVI (NCT03514693) trial, which compared the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-alone and PVI-plus strategies for persistent AF ablation. A total of 427 patients with CHADS₂ score of ≤2 points were divided into two groups: OAC continuation throughout the overall period (group C, n = 205) and OAC discontinuation within 1 year after ablation (group D, n = 222). The incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events was analyzed. Results AF recurrence (33 % vs. 17 %, p < 0.001), thromboembolic events (1.39 % vs. 0 % per year, p = 0.005), and overall bleeding event rates (7.54 % vs. 3.32 % per year, p = 0.003) were higher in group C than in group D. There was no significant difference in major bleeding event rates between the C and D groups (0.51 % vs. 0.67 % per year, p = 0.686). However, a higher number of overall bleeding events, including major and clinically relevant non-major events, was observed in group C (adjusted hazards ratio: 2.04, 95 % confidence interval: 1.14–3.65, p = 0.016). Conclusions Thromboembolic events and overall bleeding events were fewer in the OAC discontinuation group compared with the OAC continuation group. Discontinuation of OACs might be considered in patients with low CHADS₂ score after catheter ablation of persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakano et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=427). Oral anticoagulant discontinuation within 1 year after ablation vs. Oral anticoagulant continuation throughout the overall period was evaluated on Overall bleeding events (adjusted HR 2.04 (for continuation), 95% CI 1.14-3.65, p=0.016). Discontinuing oral anticoagulants after persistent AF ablation in patients with CHADS2 score ≤2 was associated with fewer overall bleeding events than continuation (3.32% vs 7.54% per year; P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: