Key result
Left atrial low-voltage area size is linked to ~21% higher macroreentrant AT recurrence post-AF ablation.
Why the study?
The relationship between induction and recurrence due to atrial tachycardia and left atrial matrix progression after AF ablation remains unclear.
Does left atrial low-voltage area size predict the induction and recurrence of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Cohort (n=152)
No
Does left atrial low-voltage area size predict the induction and recurrence of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Left atrial low-voltage area size is a significant predictor for the induction and recurrence of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia following AF ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LVA size may aid post-AF ablation risk stratification; leaves open whether LVA-targeted ablation reduces recurrence in trials.
Background The relationship between induction and recurrence due to atrial tachycardia (AT) and left atrial (LA) matrix progression after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unclear. Methods One hundred fifty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation and achieved sinus rhythm before the procedure were classified into three groups according to the AT pattern induced after the procedure: group N (non-induced), F (focal pattern), and M (macroreentrant pattern) in 3D mapping. Results The total rate of AT induction was 19.7% (30/152) in groups F ( n = 13) and M ( n = 17). Patients in group M were older than those in groups N and F, with higher CHADS 2 /CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc values, left atrial enlargement, and low-voltage area (LVA) size of LA. The receiver operating characteristic curve determined that the cut-off LVA for macroreentrant AT induction was 8.8 cm 2 (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–0.97). The recurrence of AT at 36 months in group N was 4.1% (5/122), and at the second ablation, all patients had macroreentrant AT. Patients with AT recurrence in group N had a wide LVA at the first ablation, and the cut-off LVA for AT recurrence was 6.5 cm 2 (AUC 0.94, 95%CI 0.88–0.99). Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that only LVA size was associated with the recurrence of macroreentrant AT (odds ratio 1.21, 95%CI 1.04–1.51). Conclusions It is important to develop a therapeutic strategy based on the LVA size to suppress the recurrence of AT in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonoda et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (n=152). Pulmonary vein isolation and cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation was evaluated on Recurrence of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.51, p=0.03). Left atrial low-voltage area size was independently associated with the recurrence of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation (OR 1.21).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: