Key result
CRT may reverse LBBB-induced cardiomyopathy despite lacking universal diagnostic criteria.
Why the study?
Left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy is not yet included among the possible etiologies of dilated cardiomyopathies or unclassified cardiomyopathies, and universal consensus regarding diagnostic criteria is currently lacking.
This review summarizes the prevalence, pathophysiological mechanisms, and proposed diagnostic criteria for left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy, highlighting the need for universal consensus.
Consideration of CRT may be warranted in suspected LBBB-induced cardiomyopathy; leaves open need for consensus diagnostic criteria.
Left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy is an increasingly recognized type of dilated cardiomyopathy identified in a minority but not negligible proportion of patients with newly diagnosed heart failure. However, it has not yet been included among the possible etiologies of dilated cardiomyopathies or among the unclassified cardiomyopathies. Although a few sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed, currently there is a lack of universal consensus regarding diagnostic criteria. Some specific clinical features and electrocardiography, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings are recommended to help physicians in the diagnosis of left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy. In this review, prevalence, pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic criteria, diagnostic modalities, and specific features of left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy have been addressed with attention to the differential diagnosis of other dilated cardiomyopathies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selda Murat (2023) conducted a review in Left Bundle Branch Block-Induced Cardiomyopathy. Left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy is an increasingly recognized etiology of dilated cardiomyopathy that lacks universal diagnostic criteria but may be reversible with cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: