Key result
Adding novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria improves CRT response prediction accuracy to ~81% over traditional criteria.
Why the study?
Current guideline selection criteria based on QRS morphology, QRS duration, and LVEF imperfectly identify electrical dyssynchrony, leading to a 20%-40% non-response rate to CRT and missed implantations in suitable candidates.
Do novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria improve the prediction of CRT response in patients with HFrEF and nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance?
Do novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria improve the prediction of CRT response in patients with HFrEF and nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance?
Absolute Event Rate: 81% vs 72%
p-value: p=<0.001
Novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria may improve patient selection for CRT, particularly in patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance patterns who are not perfectly captured by current guidelines.
May improve CRT selection in nonspecific IVCD; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an evidence-based effective therapy of symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction refractory to optimal medical treatment associated with intraventricular conduction disturbance, that results in electrical dyssynchrony and further deterioration of systolic ventricular function. However, the non-response rate to CRT is still 20%-40%, which can be decreased by better patient selection. The main determinant of CRT outcome is the presence or absence of significant ventricular dyssynchrony and the ability of the applied CRT technique to eliminate it. The current guidelines recommend the determination of QRS morphology and QRS duration and the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction for patient selection for CRT. However, QRS morphology and QRS duration are not perfect indicators of electrical dyssynchrony, which is the cause of the not negligible non-response rate to CRT and the missed CRT implantation in a significant number of patients who have the appropriate substrate for CRT. Using imaging modalities, many ventricular dyssynchrony criteria were devised for the detection of mechanical dyssynchrony, but their utility in patient selection for CRT is not yet proven, therefore their use is not recommended for this purpose. Moreover, CRT can eliminate only mechanical dyssynchrony due to underlying electrical dyssynchrony, for this reason ECG has a greater role in the detection of ventricular dyssynchrony than imaging modalities. To improve assessment of electrical dyssynchrony, we devised two novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria, which can estimate interventricular and left ventricular intraventricular dyssynchrony in order to improve patient selection for CRT. Here we discuss the results achieved by the application of these new ECG dyssynchrony criteria, which proved to be useful in predicting the CRT response in patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance pattern (the second greatest group of CRT candidates), and the significance of other new ECG dyssynchrony criteria in the potential improvement of CRT outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katona et al. (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=124). Novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria (intra+interDC) combined with traditional criteria vs. Traditional criteria alone was evaluated on Test accuracy for predicting clinical response to CRT (p=<0.001). The application of novel ECG dyssynchrony criteria combined with traditional criteria significantly improved the test accuracy for predicting clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy to 81% compared to 72% with traditional criteria alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: