This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
To measure the size of an earthquake, we can use two physically different quantities: the radiated seismic energy E_R E R , from which seismic magnitude scales are defined, and the seismic moment M₀ M 0 . The former depends on the dynamic process of earthquake faulting, whereas the latter does not. Nevertheless, if there exists a scaling relation between E_R E R and M₀ M 0 , we can define a magnitude scale derived from the seismic moment. The widely accepted moment magnitude scale, M_w = (log M₀ - 9.1) / (log M₀ - 9.1) 1.5 . -0pt 1.5 M w = ( log M 0 - 9.1 ) ( log M 0 - 9.1 ) 1.5 1.5 in MKS units, was established by substituting the scaling relation of E_R = 5 × 10- 5 M₀ E R = 5 × 10 - 5 M 0 into the Gutenberg-Richter empirical energy–magnitude relation, log E_R = 1.5M_s + 4.8 log E R = 1.5 M s + 4.8 . The above scaling relation comes from the energy–moment relation, E_R = (Δ τ / Δ τ 2μ . -0pt 2μ )M₀ E R = ( Δ τ Δ τ 2 μ 2 μ ) M 0 , based on a simplified energy balance equation in earthquake faulting with a uniform stress drop Δ τ Δ τ . However, this energy–moment relation is a bit strange, because the right-hand side depends exclusively on the final static state of earthquake faulting, while the left-hand side must depend on the whole dynamic process of earthquake faulting. Theoretically, the radiated seismic energy E_R E R is expressed as a function of cumulative moment <jats:a
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsuhiro Matsu’ura (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: