Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acid gas chemical absorption with aqueous amine solvents is an important industrial technology for gas processing and the capture of CO2. Vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE) reflects the efficiency of solvents and is essential to model the thermodynamics of the absorption and solvent regeneration process. In this study, several machine learning (ML) approaches were used to develop VLE models for acid gas absorption in aqueous methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) and piperazine (Pz), namely, CO2-MDEA-H2O, H2S-MDEA-H2O, CO2–H2S-MDEA-H2O, and CO2–Pz-H2O systems. New experimental data are presented for the CO2-MDEA-H2O and H2S-MDEA-H2O ternary systems, and they are used to compare the accuracy of the ML models to that of an earlier reported activity coefficient (e-NRTL)-based thermodynamic model. For the quaternary system CO2–H2S-MDEA-H2O, the ML models and the physical model are compared using experimental data from the literature because the physical model of the quaternary system is only trained on the ternary experimental systems. For this system, e-NRTL predicted CO2 & H2S VLE with RMSEs of 0.32 and 0.43 log10(mPa), whereas the ML model trained on CO2–H2S-MDEA-H2O had a RMSE of 0.39 and 0.21, respectively. The results indicate that the optimal ML approach is not systematically more accurate than the physics-based model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klimenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: