Key result
Roving catheters reduce directional dependence of bipolar voltage by ~66% versus stationary catheters.
Why the study?
Direction-aware mapping algorithms benefit stationary catheters, but their utility for roving catheters collecting electrograms at multiple angles was unknown.
Does a direction-aware mapping algorithm or roving catheter technique reduce the directional dependence of bipolar voltage amplitude in a swine model?
Does a direction-aware mapping algorithm or roving catheter technique reduce the directional dependence of bipolar voltage amplitude in a swine model?
Direction-aware mapping algorithms provide minimal additional benefit for reducing directional dependence of bipolar voltage when catheters are allowed to rove and collect electrograms at multiple angles, as is typical in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Roving catheters largely mitigate directional bias in bipolar voltage mapping in swine; leaves open whether direction-aware algorithms add value clinically.
INTRODUCTION: Direction-aware mapping algorithms improve the accuracy of voltage mapping by measuring the maximal voltage amplitude recorded in the direction of wavefront propagation. While beneficial for stationary catheters, its utility for roving catheters collecting electrograms (EGMs) at multiple angles is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the directional dependence of bipolar voltage amplitude between stationary and roving catheters. METHODS: In 10 swine, a transcaval ablation line with a gap was created. The gap was mapped using an array catheter (Optrell™; Biosense Webster). In Step 1, the array was kept stationary over the gap, and four voltage maps were created during activation of the gap from superior, inferior, septal, and lateral directions. In Step 2, four additional maps were created; however, the catheter was allowed to move with points acquired at multiple angles. In Step 3, the gap was remapped; however, bipoles were computed using a direction-aware mapping algorithm. RESULTS: In a stationary catheter position, bipolar voltage distribution was influenced by the direction of activation with maximal differences obtained between orthogonal directions 32% (13%-53%). However, roving the catheter produced similar bipolar voltage maps irrespective of the direction of activation 11% (5%-18%). A direction-aware mapping algorithm was beneficial for reducing the directional dependence of voltage maps created by stationary catheters but not by roving catheters. CONCLUSION: The directional dependency of bipolar voltage amplitude is greatest when the catheter is stationary. However, when the catheter is allowed to rove and collect EGMs at multiple angles as occurs clinically, the directional dependence of bipolar voltage is minimal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yavin et al. (2021) studied Cardiac mapping (swine model) (n=10). Roving catheter mapping and direction-aware mapping algorithm vs. Stationary catheter mapping was evaluated on Maximal differences in bipolar voltage amplitude between orthogonal directions of activation. Roving catheters collecting electrograms at multiple angles minimized the directional dependence of bipolar voltage amplitude to 11% compared to 32% with stationary catheters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: