Key result
Mesorectal division duration strongly correlates with robotic proctectomy console time, providing an objective workflow metric.
Why the study?
Assessments of surgical workflow offer insight regarding procedure variability, case complexity, and surgeon proficiency, prompting evaluation of step-by-step workflow and step transitions during robotic proctectomy.
Observational (n=31)
No
Effect estimate: ρ = 0.71
Standardized annotation of robotic proctectomy steps provides an objective approach to quantify surgical workflow and identifies specific steps that strongly correlate with console and total operative times.
May support workflow analysis in robotic surgery; leaves open effects on training or outcomes.
Abstract Aim: Assessments of surgical workflow offer insight regarding procedure variability, case complexity and surgeon proficiency. We utilize an objective method to evaluate step-by-step workflow and step transitions during robotic proctectomy (RP). Methods: We annotated 31 RPs using a procedure-specific annotation card. Using Spearman’s correlation, we measured strength of association of step time and step visit frequency with console time (CT) and total operative time (TOT). Results: Across 31 RPs, a mean (± standard deviation) of 49.0 (± 20.3) steps occurred per procedure. Mean CT and TOT were 213 (± 90) and 283 (± 108) minutes. Posterior mesorectal dissection required most visits (8.7 ± 5.0), while anastomosis required most time (18.0 [± 8.5] minutes). Inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) ligation required least visits (1.0 ± 0.0) and lowest duration (0.9 [± 0.5] minutes). Strong correlations were seen with CT and step times for IMV dissection and ligation (ρ = 0.60 for both), lateral-to-medial splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) (ρ = 0.63), left rectal dissection (ρ = 0.64) and mesorectal division (ρ = 0.71). CT correlated strongly with medial-to-lateral and supracolic SFM visit frequency (ρ = 0.75 and ρ = 0.65). There were strong correlations with TOT and initial exposure time (ρ = 0.60), as well as visit frequency for medial-to-lateral (ρ = 0.67) and supracolic SFM (ρ = 0.65). Descending colon mobilization was nodal, rectal mobilization convergent and rectal transection divergent. Conclusion: This study correlates individual surgical steps with CT and TOT through standardized annotation. It provides an objective approach to quantify workflow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gillani et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Robotic proctectomy (n=31). Robotic proctectomy was evaluated on Correlation of mesorectal division duration with console time (ρ = 0.71). Standardized annotation of robotic proctectomy revealed that specific steps, such as mesorectal division, strongly correlated with console time (ρ = 0.71), providing an objective workflow metric.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: