Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A model of parallel computation based on a generalization of nondeterminism in Turing machines is introduced. Complexity classes //T(n)-TIME, //L(n)-SPACE, //LOGSPACE, //PTIME, etc. are defined for these machines in a way analogous to T(n)-TIME, L(n)-SPACE, LOGSPACE, PTIME, etc. for deterministic machines. It is shown that, given appropriate honesty conditions, L(n)-SPACE ⊆ //L(n)2-TIME T(n)-TIME ⊆ //log T(n)-SPACE //L(n)-SPACE ⊆ exp L(n)-TIME //T(n)-TIME ⊆ T(n)2-SPACE thus · · //EXPTIME = EXPSPACE //PSPACE = EXPTIME //PTIME = PSPACE //LOGSPACE = PTIME ? = LOGSPACE That is, the deterministic hierarchy LOGSPACE ⊆ PTIME ⊆ PSPACE ⊆ EXPTIME ⊆ ... shifts by exactly one level when parallelism is introduced. We give a natural characterization of the polynomial time hierarchy of Stockmeyer and Meyer in terms of parallel machines. Analogous space hierarchies are defined and explored, and a generalization of Saviten's result NONDET-L(n)-SPACE ⊆ L(n)2-SPACE is given. Parallel finite automata are defined, and it is shown that, although they accept only regular sets, in general 22k states are necessary and sufficient to simulate a k-state parallel finite automaton deterministically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dexter Kozen (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: