Key result
Balloon-expandable TAVR learning curve plateaus at ~200 cases, with no curve seen for Sapien 3.
Why the study?
Given conflicting findings of previous studies, it was unclear whether a volume-outcomes relationship persisted after the initial learning curve for balloon-expandable TAVR, or differed across device generations.
Does center case volume and experience affect 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR with balloon-expandable prostheses?
Observational (n=61,949)
Yes
Does center case volume and experience affect 30-day outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR with balloon-expandable prostheses?
With current-generation balloon-expandable TAVR (Sapien 3), centers can achieve excellent outcomes even during early case experience without a demonstrable learning curve or volume-outcomes relationship.
Hypothesis-generating for Sapien 3 TAVR at lower-volume centers; prospective studies needed to confirm volume independence.
BACKGROUND: Given conflicting findings of previous studies, much remains to be understood regarding a volume-outcomes relationship (VOR) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was: 1) to determine if, after the initial learning curve (LC), a VOR for balloon-expandable (BE) TAVR persisted; and 2) to determine if LCs and VORs differed across different device generations. METHODS: Data collected by the TVT registry for BE valve implants from November 2011 through January 2017 were included in this analysis (n = 61,949). Primary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, stroke, and major vascular complications. For each center, all implants were ordered chronologically according to case sequence number (CS#). To determine where the learning curve terminated (LCT), a grid search analysis was applied across a range of CS# from 10 to 300 by increments of 1. After LCT, the VOR was assessed by examining case volume/month by center. This analysis was performed separately for: 1) all BE valve types; 2) Sapien 3 (S3) only; and 3) S3 in BE valve naïve sites. RESULTS: In experience with all commercially available BE valve types, there was an initial LC that terminates around case #201. After the initial LC, a volume-outcomes relationship was no longer evident. In analysis limited to S3, there was no demonstrable LC or VOR. Likewise, there was no demonstrable LC or VOR with S3 for BE valve naïve sites. CONCLUSIONS: After a case experience of 200 cases, there was LCT; subsequent to initial learning, a VOR was no longer evident. In the S3-only analysis, there was no LC or no demonstrable VOR. With current-generation BE-TAVR, centers should expect to achieve consistently excellent outcomes even during early case experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russo et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=61,949). Balloon-expandable TAVR vs. Case sequence number and case volume/month was evaluated on 30-day all-cause mortality, stroke, and major vascular complications. For balloon-expandable TAVR, an initial learning curve terminated around 200 cases, after which a volume-outcomes relationship was no longer evident, with no learning curve seen for Sapien 3 valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: