Key result
BP time series dynamics improve hospital mortality prediction when added to SAPS-I or APACHE-III scores.
Why the study?
Does combining physiological time series dynamics of HR and BP with baseline acuity measures improve the prediction of hospital mortality in ICU patients?
Observational (n=450)
Does combining physiological time series dynamics of HR and BP with baseline acuity measures improve the prediction of hospital mortality in ICU patients?
p-value: p=0.005, 0.045
Physiological time series dynamics of vital signs contain prognostic value beyond baseline acuity measures and can independently predict outcomes in the ICU.
BP dynamics may augment ICU acuity scores for mortality prediction; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before adoption.
Cardiovascular variables such as heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) are regulated by an underlying control system, and therefore, the time series of these vital signs exhibit rich dynamical patterns of interaction in response to external perturbations (e.g., drug administration), as well as pathological states (e.g., onset of sepsis and hypotension). A question of interest is whether "similar" dynamical patterns can be identified across a heterogeneous patient cohort, and be used for prognosis of patients' health and progress. In this paper, we used a switching vector autoregressive framework to systematically learn and identify a collection of vital sign time series dynamics, which are possibly recurrent within the same patient and may be shared across the entire cohort. We show that these dynamical behaviors can be used to characterize the physiological "state" of a patient. We validate our technique using simulated time series of the cardiovascular system, and human recordings of HR and BP time series from an orthostatic stress study with known postural states. Using the HR and BP dynamics of an intensive care unit (ICU) cohort of over 450 patients from the MIMIC II database, we demonstrate that the discovered cardiovascular dynamics are significantly associated with hospital mortality (dynamic modes 3 and 9, p=0.001, p=0.006 from logistic regression after adjusting for the APACHE scores). Combining the dynamics of BP time series and SAPS-I or APACHE-III provided a more accurate assessment of patient survival/mortality in the hospital than using SAPS-I and APACHE-III alone (p=0.005 and p=0.045). Our results suggest that the discovered dynamics of vital sign time series may contain additional prognostic value beyond that of the baseline acuity measures, and can potentially be used as an independent predictor of outcomes in the ICU.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehman et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Intensive care unit (ICU) patients (n=450). Vital sign time series dynamics (HR and BP) combined with SAPS-I or APACHE-III vs. SAPS-I and APACHE-III alone was evaluated on Hospital mortality (p=0.005, 0.045). Combining blood pressure time series dynamics with SAPS-I or APACHE-III scores provided a more accurate assessment of hospital mortality than using the clinical scores alone (p=0.005 and p=0.045).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: