Key result
Extended Holter monitoring after stroke or TIA detects ~1% additional AF cases beyond standard screening.
Why the study?
Guidelines recommend continuous electrocardiographic monitoring >48 h for AF in undetermined ischemic stroke or TIA, but the yield of this approach versus extending monitoring up to 14 days was unassessed.
Does 14-day Holter monitoring improve atrial fibrillation detection compared to 48-hour monitoring in patients with recent stroke or TIA?
Observational (n=379)
No
Does 14-day Holter monitoring improve atrial fibrillation detection compared to 48-hour monitoring in patients with recent stroke or TIA?
Extending Holter monitoring from 48 hours to 14 days in low-risk patients with recent stroke or TIA provides a low additional yield for detecting atrial fibrillation.
Low additional AF yield with 14-day Holter in low-risk stroke/TIA; leaves open selective use in higher-risk groups.
Introduction: Current European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines recommend >48 h of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for atrial fibrillation (AF) in all patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) with undetermined origin. We assessed the yield of the guideline-recommended monitoring for AF, as well as of extending monitoring up to 14 days. Patients and methods: We included consecutive patients with stroke/TIA without AF in an academic hospital in The Netherlands. We reported AF incidence and number needed to screen (NNS) in the overall sample after 48 h and 14 days of Holter monitoring. Results: Among 379 patients with median age 63 years (IQR 55-73), 58% male, Holter monitoring detected 10 cases of incident AF during a median of 13 (IQR 12-14) days of monitoring. Seven AF cases were detected within the first 48 hours (incidence 1.85%, 95% CI 0.74-3.81; NNS 54), and three additional AF cases were recorded among the 362 patients with >48 h of monitoring and without AF ⩽ 48 h (incidence 0.83%, 95% CI: 0.17-2.42; NNS 121). All AF cases were detected within the first 7 days of monitoring. Our sample was subject to sampling bias favoring inclusion of participants with low AF risk. Discussion: Strengths of this work were the broad inclusion criteria as recommended by ESO guidelines, and high Holter adherence among participants. The analysis was limited by inclusion of lower-risk cases and a relatively small sample size. Conclusion: In low-risk patients with recent stroke or TIA, ESO guideline-recommended screening for AF resulted in a low AF yield, with limited additional value of monitoring up to 14 days. Our results underline the need for a personalized approach in determining a patient's optimum duration for post-stroke non-invasive ambulatory monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Himmelreich et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) without atrial fibrillation (n=379). 14-day Holter monitoring vs. 48-hour Holter monitoring was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation incidence. Extending Holter monitoring up to 14 days in low-risk patients with recent stroke or TIA yielded only 3 additional cases of atrial fibrillation (0.83% incidence) beyond the first 48 hours.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: