An explicit evaluation is made of the fluctuation-induced diamagnetism from zeropoint fluctuations, which have been neglected in a previous calculation by Maki and Takayama. It is shown that in fact this contribution has another scaling field ~φ₀l², as calculated previously by Lee and Payne and by Kurkij\"arvi, Ambegaokar, and Eilenberger. However, this term gives rise to an almost constant susceptibility (of the same order as Landau diamagnetism) in the field region of experimental interest [i.e., H~Hc2(0), the upper critical field at $T=0$ K].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazumi Maki (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: