Key result
Unipolar electrogram mapping during sinus rhythm revealed 8% vs 2% class C electrograms in canine preparations with vs without inducible ventricular tachycardia (p<0.005).
Why the study?
Does sinus rhythm mapping using unipolar electrograms identify the reentrant pathway of ventricular tachycardia in a canine model of myocardial infarction?
Does sinus rhythm mapping using unipolar electrograms identify the reentrant pathway of ventricular tachycardia in a canine model of myocardial infarction?
p-value: p=<0.005
Unipolar electrogram mapping during sinus rhythm can identify critically located delayed activity corresponding to the common reentrant pathway of inducible ventricular tachycardia in a canine infarct model.
Hypothesis-generating for sinus rhythm unipolar mapping in post-MI VT; extends canine models but leaves open human translation.
The relationship between electrograms recorded during sinus rhythm and the activation sequence during ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed stimulation was investigated in a canine model of myocardial infarction. Thirteen dogs were studied 3 days (n = 10) or 14 days (n = 3) after coronary occlusion. Sixty-three unipolar electrograms were simultaneously recorded with a sock electrode array connected to a digital recording system, and analyzed by computer. Bipolar electrograms were recorded sequentially from the same sites with an analog recorder. Categories of unipolar electrograms were defined with reference to the QRS complex during sinus rhythm as follows: Class A included electrograms with an intrinsic deflection inscribed within the QRS complex, class B included those which did not exhibit any intrinsic rs deflection, and class C included those with an intrinsic deflection inscribed later than QRS. The epicardial distribution of each class of electrograms was significantly different between the preparations with, and those without inducible tachycardia (72% versus 63% of electrograms being in class A, 20% versus 35% in class B, and 8% versus 2% in class C; p less than 0.005). When tachycardia was inducible, class C epicardial electrograms were located in an area extending across the region of infarction, which corresponded to the common reentrant pathway of figure-of-eight patterns mapped during tachycardia. When ventricular tachycardia was not inducible, class B electrograms were recorded all over this region. The morphology of bipolar electrograms had no predictive value in identifying the common reentrant pathway. These results support the view that the inducibility of reentrant tachycardia is dependent upon critically located delayed activity detected during sinus rhythm by unipolar recordings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
PAGÉ et al. (1988) studied Ventricular tachycardia in myocardial infarction (n=13). Unipolar and bipolar electrogram mapping during sinus rhythm vs. Preparations without inducible tachycardia was evaluated on Epicardial distribution of unipolar electrogram classes (p=<0.005). Unipolar electrogram mapping during sinus rhythm revealed 8% vs 2% class C electrograms in canine preparations with vs without inducible ventricular tachycardia (p<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: