Key result
Embedding a nurse practitioner to assist resident physicians increased discharge summaries completed within 24 hours (67% vs. 47%, P<0.001) but did not affect 30-day hospital reutilization.
Why the study?
Does embedding a nurse practitioner in a resident team improve discharge communication, patient follow-up, and hospital reutilization in a general medicine population?
RCT
randomly assigned
No
Does embedding a nurse practitioner in a resident team improve discharge communication, patient follow-up, and hospital reutilization in a general medicine population?
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 47%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Embedding a discharge facilitator improves discharge communication, patient follow-up, and resident efficiency, but does not reduce 30-day hospital reutilization.
Supports NP-assisted discharge processes in residency programs; extends workflow efficiency evidence but leaves open reutilization benefits.
BACKGROUND: Hospital discharges are vulnerable periods for patient safety, especially in teaching hospitals where discharges are done by residents with competing demands. We sought to assess whether embedding a nurse practitioner on a medical team to help physicians with the discharge process would improve communication, patient follow-up, and hospital reutilization. METHODS: A 5-month randomized controlled trial was conducted on the medical service at an academic tertiary-care hospital. A nurse practitioner was randomly assigned to 1 resident team to complete discharge paperwork, arrange follow-up appointments and prescriptions, communicate discharge plans with nursing and primary care physicians, and answer questions from discharged patients. RESULTS: Intervention patients had more discharge summaries completed within 24 hours (67% vs. 47%, P < 0.001). Similarly, they had more follow-up appointments scheduled by the time of discharge (62% vs. 36%, P < 0.0001) and attended those appointments more often within 2 weeks (36% vs. 23%, P < 0.0002). Intervention patients knew whom to call with questions (95% vs. 85%, P = 0.003) and were more satisfied with the discharge process (97% vs. 76%, P < 0.0001). Attending rounds on the intervention team finished on time (45% vs. 31%, P = 0.058), and residents signed out on average 46 minutes earlier each day. There was no significant difference between the groups in 30-day emergency department visits or readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Helping resident physicians with the discharge process improves many aspects of discharge communication and patient follow-up, and saves residents' time, but had no effect on hospital reutilization for a general medicine population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finn et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in General medicine population. Embedded nurse practitioner discharge facilitator vs. Standard care (no embedded nurse practitioner) was evaluated on Discharge summaries completed within 24 hours (p=< 0.001). Embedding a nurse practitioner to assist resident physicians increased discharge summaries completed within 24 hours (67% vs. 47%, P<0.001) but did not affect 30-day hospital reutilization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: