Key result
C188-9 alleviates heart injury and fibrosis in mice by suppressing STAT3 activation.
Why the study?
Does C188-9 reduce cardiac fibrosis in vitro and in an isoproterenol-induced mouse model?
Does C188-9 reduce cardiac fibrosis in vitro and in an isoproterenol-induced mouse model?
p-value: p=<0.05
C188-9, a STAT3 inhibitor, demonstrates antifibrotic effects in vitro and in a mouse model of isoproterenol-induced cardiac fibrosis, suggesting potential as a therapeutic target for adverse myocardial remodeling.
Hypothesis-generating for STAT3 inhibition in cardiac fibrosis; prospective human studies required before clinical consideration.
Cardiac fibrosis is the final event of heart failure and is associated with almost all forms of cardiovascular disease. Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), a major cell type in the heart, are responsible for regulating normal myocardial function and maintaining extracellular matrix homeostasis in adverse myocardial remodeling. In this study, we found that C188-9, a small-molecule inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), exhibited an antifibrotic function, both in vitro and in vivo. C188-9 decreased transforming growth factor-β1-induced CF activation and fibrotic gene expression. Moreover, C188-9 treatment alleviated heart injury and cardiac fibrosis in an isoproterenol-induced mouse model by suppressing STAT3 phosphorylation and activation. These findings may help us better understand the role of C188-9 in cardiac fibrosis and facilitate the development of new treatments for cardiac fibrosis and other cardiovascular diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) studied Cardiac fibrosis. C188-9 vs. Vehicle (DMSO) was evaluated on Cardiac dysfunction and fibrosis (ejection fraction, fractional shortening, and collagen area) (p=<0.05). C188-9 treatment alleviated heart injury and cardiac fibrosis in an isoproterenol-induced mouse model by suppressing STAT3 phosphorylation and activation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: