Key result
Catheter-based treatment fails to reduce 12-month mortality vs anticoagulation alone in intermediate-high risk PE.
Why the study?
It is unclear whether intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients benefit from catheter-based therapies compared to anticoagulation alone regarding mortality.
Does catheter-based treatment reduce all-cause mortality in patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism compared to anticoagulation alone?
Cohort (n=236)
No
Does catheter-based treatment reduce all-cause mortality in patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism compared to anticoagulation alone?
Absolute Event Rate: 11% vs 14%
p-value: p=0.150
In patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism, catheter-based therapies did not significantly reduce 12-month all-cause mortality compared to anticoagulation alone.
Anticoagulation remains standard; this observational result leaves open whether catheter-based therapies reduce mortality in randomized trials.
Introduction Pulmonary embolism is a common and potentially fatal medical condition. Current guidelines recommend therapeutic anticoagulation for intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism as a first-line strategy. However, it is unclear whether these patients may benefit from interventional treatments, such as catheter-based thrombectomy or catheter-based thrombolysis, compared to anticoagulation alone regarding mortality. Our aim was to gain insight into optimal treatment strategies of intermediate-high risk PE patients and to evaluate outcomes of different management strategies with regard to all-cause mortality. Methods We retrospectively evaluated a total of 236 patients, 133 patients undergoing catheter-based thrombectomy or catheter-based thrombolysis (interventional group) and 103 patients receiving anticoagulation alone (conservative group) at our institution between 2003 and 2024. All patients were classified as intermediate-high risk. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results The overall mortality for all patients with intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism was 12.0% at 12 months. Depending on the treatment approach, all-cause mortality after 12 months occurred in 14 of 103 patients (14.0%) in the conservative group and in 14 of 133 patients (11.0%) in the interventional group which did not significantly differ ( p = 0.150). Discussion In patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism catheter-based treatment did not show a significant reduction in mortality within 12 months compared to anticoagulation alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brugger et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (n=236). Catheter-based therapy (thrombectomy or thrombolysis) vs. Anticoagulation alone was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 12 months (p=0.150). Catheter-based treatment did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 12 months compared to anticoagulation alone in patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (11.0% vs 14.0%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: