Key result
Ipragliflozin reduced glycated haemoglobin levels from 8.5% to 7.5% compared to 8.5% to 7.8% with sitagliptin (between-group difference 0.34%; 95% CI 0.10%-0.43%; p=0.088) at 24 weeks.
Why the study?
To compare the glucose-lowering efficacy, cardiometabolic parameters, and safety of ipragliflozin versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea.
Does ipragliflozin improve glycaemic control and cardiometabolic parameters compared to sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea?
RCT (n=140)
Randomized
Does ipragliflozin improve glycaemic control and cardiometabolic parameters compared to sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea?
Ipragliflozin add-on therapy provides comparable glycaemic control to sitagliptin but offers additional benefits in fat mass reduction, fatty liver indices, and endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Ipragliflozin offers comparable glycaemic control to sitagliptin; extends evidence of cardiometabolic benefits in metformin/sulphonylurea-treated type 2 diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: In patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea, we compared the glucose-lowering efficacy, cardiometabolic parameters and safety of two drugs, ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, and sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with 7.5%-9.0% glycated haemoglobin treated with metformin and sulphonylurea were randomly assigned to ipragliflozin (50 mg, n = 70) or sitagliptin (100 mg, n = 70) therapy for 24 weeks. Measures of glycaemic control, fatty liver indices, other metabolic parameters and subclinical atherosclerosis were compared by a paired t-test before and after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Mean glycated haemoglobin levels decreased from 8.5% to 7.5% in the ipragliflozin group and from 8.5% to 7.8% in the sitagliptin group, resulting in a 0.34% between-group difference (95% confidence interval, 0.10%-0.43%, p = .088). Fasting and postprandial 2-h glucose levels also showed a similar trend, with a greater reduction with ipragliflozin therapy. An increase of over 70% in ketone levels and a decrease in whole body and abdominal fat masses were observed with ipragliflozin treatment. Fatty liver indices also improved with ipragliflozin treatment. Despite no difference in carotid intima-media thickness and ankle-brachial index, ipragliflozin therapy improved flow-mediated vasodilation, reflecting endothelial function, while sitagliptin did not. The safety profile did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ipragliflozin add-on therapy can be a viable option for better glycaemic control with multiple vascular and metabolic benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea (n=140). Ipragliflozin vs. Sitagliptin (100 mg) was evaluated on Glycated haemoglobin levels (Difference 0.34%, 95% CI 0.10%-0.43%, p=0.088). Ipragliflozin reduced glycated haemoglobin levels from 8.5% to 7.5% compared to 8.5% to 7.8% with sitagliptin (between-group difference 0.34%; 95% CI 0.10%-0.43%; p=0.088) at 24 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: