Key result
Ipragliflozin lowers HbA1c ~0.4% more than sitagliptin in patients with high fatty liver index.
Why the study?
Does ipragliflozin compared to sitagliptin improve HbA1c reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes without established ASCVD, stratified by fatty liver index?
RCT (n=91)
randomised
Does ipragliflozin compared to sitagliptin improve HbA1c reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes without established ASCVD, stratified by fatty liver index?
In patients with type 2 diabetes, a high fatty liver index may predict a better glycemic response to ipragliflozin compared to sitagliptin as second-line therapy.
AIMS: To explore whether fatty liver index (FLI) stratification is associated with differential glycemic responses to sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors as second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this exploratory post hoc analysis of a previous 52-week randomised trial of ipragliflozin versus sitagliptin added to metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes, 91 patients were stratified by median FLI into low (< 51; n = 44) and high (≥ 51; n = 47) groups. The outcome was the 52-week change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). The treatment-by-FLI interaction was tested by baseline-HbA1c-adjusted analysis of covariance; FLI was also modelled continuously and parallel analyses used body mass index (BMI) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). RESULTS: The baseline-HbA1c-adjusted treatment-by-FLI interaction was significant at 52 weeks (p = 0.013): ipragliflozin was associated with a greater HbA1c reduction than sitagliptin in the high FLI group (-0.41%, 95% confidence interval -0.77, -0.06; p = 0.023), with no significant difference in the low FLI group (+0.24%; p = 0.194). The interaction was also significant with FLI modelled continuously (p = 0.013) and in mixed-model and multiple-imputation sensitivity analyses (p = 0.010 and 0.003). BMI and ALT showed similar significant interactions (p = 0.028 and 0.032), favouring ipragliflozin in the high-value subgroup. FLI provided the clearest signal but was not the only effect modifier. CONCLUSIONS: FLI-based stratification was associated with differential glycemic responses to ipragliflozin versus sitagliptin. These findings are hypothesis-generating, given the small, complete-case sample and the sample-derived cut-off. Prospective studies are warranted before FLI can inform antidiabetic drug selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitazawa et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=91). Ipragliflozin vs. Sitagliptin was evaluated on 52-week change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (MD -0.41%, 95% CI -0.77 to -0.06, p=0.023). Ipragliflozin was associated with a significantly greater HbA1c reduction than sitagliptin in patients with a high fatty liver index (difference -0.41%; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.06; P=0.023).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: