This paper studies how US inflation dynamics have evolved as labor-market institutions weakened and expectations became more central to price-setting. Using quarterly data from 1984Q1–2023Q4, we estimate Phillips-Curve-style regressions that allow inflation to depend on expected inflation, lagged inflation, and interactions between unemployment and union density, and we complement these results with a multivariate vector autoregression (VAR) to trace dynamic responses. Three findings emerge. First, inflation is best explained by a joint expectations–persistence component: expected inflation, lagged expectations, and lagged inflation together account for substantially more variation in inflation than specifications based on unemployment or the output gap alone. Second, interaction between the unemployment–union-density is economically meaningful, consistent with weaker collective bargaining dampening the wage channel and contributing to a flatter inflation–slack relationship. Third, VAR impulse responses indicate that expectation shocks transmit to inflation primarily over short horizons, while inflation persistence remains a dominant propagation mechanism. These results imply that inflation stabilization increasingly depends on anchoring expectations and understanding labor-market structure, rather than relying on slack measures as sufficient statistics for inflationary pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masaaki Yoshimori (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: