PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2012Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance150 citationsOpen Access

Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy can be identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and is associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction

AEA. EllimsLIL. IlesLLLiang‐Han Ling

Key Result

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping revealed significantly shorter post-contrast myocardial T1 times in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients compared to controls (498 vs 561 ms), indicating diffuse myocardial fibrosis.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=76)

Blinding

Blinded image analysis

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does cardiovascular magnetic resonance with post-contrast T1 mapping identify diffuse myocardial fibrosis and correlate with diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

P
Population
76 patients (51 with asymmetric septal hypertrophy due to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 25 healthy controls)
I
Intervention
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with post-contrast T1 mapping
C
Comparator
Healthy controls
O
Outcome
Post-contrast myocardial T1 time and its correlation with diastolic function (mean E/e')surrogate

CMR post-contrast T1 mapping can non-invasively identify diffuse myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which correlates with the severity of diastolic dysfunction.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 498% vs 561%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • No patients with severe (NYHA class III or IV) symptoms were included.
  • Potential confounders such as variations in the timing of image acquisition after contrast administration, heart rate, hematocrit, and renal function.
  • Myocardial edema was not directly assessed.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of myocardial fibrosis is associated with worse clinical outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences can detect regional, but not diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Post-contrast T(1) mapping is an emerging CMR technique that may enable the non-invasive evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in HCM. The purpose of this study was to non-invasively detect and quantify diffuse myocardial fibrosis in HCM with CMR and examine its relationship to diastolic performance. METHODS: We performed CMR on 76 patients - 51 with asymmetric septal hypertrophy due to HCM and 25 healthy controls. Left ventricular (LV) morphology, function and distribution of regional myocardial fibrosis were evaluated with cine imaging and LGE. A CMR T(1) mapping sequence determined the post-contrast myocardial T(1) time as an index of diffuse myocardial fibrosis. Diastolic function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: Regional myocardial fibrosis was observed in 84% of the HCM group. Post-contrast myocardial T(1) time was significantly shorter in patients with HCM compared to controls, consistent with diffuse myocardial fibrosis (498 ± 80 ms vs. 561 ± 47 ms, p < 0.001). In HCM patients, post-contrast myocardial T(1) time correlated with mean E/e' (r = -0.48, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCM have shorter post-contrast myocardial T(1) times, consistent with diffuse myocardial fibrosis, which correlate with estimated LV filling pressure, suggesting a mechanistic link between diffuse myocardial fibrosis and abnormal diastolic function in HCM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ellims et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=76). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance with post-contrast T1 mapping vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Post-contrast myocardial T1 time (p=<0.001). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping revealed significantly shorter post-contrast myocardial T1 times in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients compared to controls (498 vs 561 ms), indicating diffuse myocardial fibrosis.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f1ebd04e2b0ba896c92b7https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-14-76
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper