Why the study?
The study aimed to examine changes in stroke risk over time and determine OAC initiation rates as stroke risk increased from low/moderate to high in patients with AF.
What proportion of primary care patients with atrial fibrillation are initiated on oral anticoagulants when their stroke risk increases to high, and what is the delay in initiation?
What proportion of primary care patients with atrial fibrillation are initiated on oral anticoagulants when their stroke risk increases to high, and what is the delay in initiation?
A significant proportion of atrial fibrillation patients who transition to high stroke risk in primary care experience substantial delays or failure in receiving guideline-recommended oral anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Delays in OAC initiation for newly high-risk AF patients persist in primary care; leaves open targeted implementation strategies to improve uptake.
AIM: To examine the change in stroke risk over time and determine the proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were initiated on an oral anticoagulant (OAC) as their stroke risk increased from low/moderate to high, using the Australian general practice data set, MedicineInsight. METHODS: A total of 2296 patients diagnosed with AF between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2008, aged 18 years or older and not initiated on an OAC before 2009, were included. We assessed the change in stroke risk and the proportion of patients who had a recorded prescription of an OAC, each year from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018. Nearly two-thirds of patients (65%, 412/632) whose stroke risk changed from baseline low/moderate to high were subsequently prescribed an OAC. The median (interquartile range) lag time from becoming high stroke risk to having OAC initiation was 2 (5) years. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of patients reclassified as being at high risk of stroke during the study period were not prescribed OAC therapy. Furthermore, the delay in OAC initiation following classification as being at high risk was a median of 2 years, suggesting that more frequent stroke reassessment is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bezabhe et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: