Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The adoption of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (IPMSM) in Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) drives the need for innovative approaches to improve control performance and power conversion efficiency. This paper aims at evaluating advanced Model Predictive Control (MPC) strategies for IPMSM drives in a methodic comparison with the most widespread Field Oriented Control (FOC). Different extensions of direct Finite Control Set MPC (FCS-MPC) and indirect Continuous Control Set MPC (CCS-MPC) MPCs are considered and evaluated in terms of reference tracking performance, robustness, power efficiency, and complexity based on Matlab, Simulink™ simulations. Results confirm the inherent better control quality of MPCs over FOC in general and allow us to further identify some possible directions for improvement. Moreover, indirect MPCs perform better, but complexity may prevent them from supporting real-time implementation in some cases. On the other hand, direct MPCs are less complex and reduce inverter losses but at the cost of increased Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) and decreased robustness to parameters deviations. These results also highlight various trade-offs between different predictive control strategies and their feasibility for high-performance automotive applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cocogne et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: