Key result
Conventional mapping in atypical AVNRT detects only 64% of right inferior extensions versus 3D mapping.
Why the study?
During atypical AVNRT, retrograde slow pathway conduction exits at the LIE in the CS or RIE on the TA, but the validity of conventional electrode placement-based mapping of these atrial ends was untested.
Does 3D electroanatomical mapping improve the localization of right inferior extensions compared to conventional electrode catheter placement in patients with atypical AVNRT?
Observational (n=14)
No
Does 3D electroanatomical mapping improve the localization of right inferior extensions compared to conventional electrode catheter placement in patients with atypical AVNRT?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conventional electrode catheter placement misses 36% of right inferior extensions in atypical AVNRT, highlighting the necessity of 3D mapping or posterior tricuspid annulus catheter placement for accurate diagnosis and ablation.
Background During atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), the earliest atrial activation site following retrograde slow pathway (SP) conduction is at the atrial exit of the left inferior extension of the compact node (LIE) in the coronary sinus (CS) or the right inferior extension (RIE) on the tricuspid annulus (TA). We tested the validity of conventional electrode placement-based mapping of the atrial ends of these extensions. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the efficiency of the two catheter (His bundle and CS) mapping method for localization of LIE and RIE in atypical AVNRT patient using electroanatomical 3D mapping validation. Results Among 19 atypical AVNRTs (15 fast/slow and 4 slow/slow) in 14 patients (9 females, age 59±17), 8 AVNRTs had LIE involvement and 11 had RIE. The 8 LIE exits were inside the CS, and localization by 3D mapping and CS electrode catheter matched in all. In contrast, RIE exits were on the posterior TA where electrode catheters are conventionally not placed. All RIE exits required 3D mapping for accurate localization. During retrograde RIE conduction, comparison of the activation time of the CS ostium and HBE showed that the CS ostium was earlier in 7 RIEs, HBE was earlier in 1, and they were simultaneous in 3, resulting in the presence of RIE being missed in 4/11 (36%) AVNRTs using current diagnostic criteria. Activation time of the CS ostium and His bundle were determined by their relative closeness to the RIE exit. Conclusions Conventionally placed electrode catheter mapping in atypical AVNRT was able to identify 100% of LIE, but only 64% of RIE. It is critical to place a catheter on or use a 3D mapping system for the posterior TA in cases of suspected atypical AVNRT, so that all inferior extensions of the AV node can be identified and targeted for treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawabata et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=14). Conventional electrode catheter mapping vs. 3D electroanatomical mapping was evaluated on Identification of right inferior extension (RIE) exits. Conventionally placed electrode catheter mapping in atypical AVNRT successfully identified 100% of left inferior extensions but only 64% of right inferior extensions compared to 3D mapping.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: