Key result
Deep learning model predicts LVEF from automated 2D echocardiograms within 4.0 percentage points.
Why the study?
Does a deep multi-stream model accurately predict LVEF from 2D echocardiography?
Observational (n=12,648)
No
Does a deep multi-stream model accurately predict LVEF from 2D echocardiography?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel deep multi-stream model accurately predicts LVEF from 2D echocardiography, achieving a mean absolute error of 4.0%.
We propose a deep multi-stream model for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) prediction in 2D echocardiographic (2DE) examinations. We use four standard 2DE views as model input, which are automatically selected from the full 2DE examination. The LVEF prediction model processes eight streams of data (images + optical flow) and consists of convolutional neural networks terminated with transformer layers. The model is made robust to missing, misclassified and duplicate views via pre-training, sampling strategies and parameter sharing. The model is trained and evaluated on an existing clinical dataset (12,648 unique examinations) with varying properties in terms of quality, examining physician, and ultrasound system. We report [Formula: see text] and mean absolute error = 4.0% points for the test set. When evaluated on two public benchmarks, the model performs on par or better than all previous attempts on fully automatic LVEF prediction. Code and trained models are available on a public project repository .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvén et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment (n=12,648). Deep multi-stream model (8-stream CNN and transformer) vs. Manual clinical assessment (ground truth) was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) for LVEF prediction (R2 0.84). A deep 8-stream model using four automatically selected 2D echocardiographic views predicted left ventricular ejection fraction with an R2 of 0.84 and a mean absolute error of 4.0 percentage points.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: