PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1972Circulation346 citations

Effect of Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Myocardial Infarction on Left Ventricular Compliance in Man

View Full Paper
GDGeorge DiamondJFJames S. Forrester

Key Result

Coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction significantly increased myocardial wall stiffness compared to normal subjects (passive elastic modulus 0.011 and 0.045 vs 0.005, P<0.005).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=38)

Structured PICO

Does the presence of coronary artery disease or acute myocardial infarction alter left ventricular compliance in humans?

P
Population
38 subjects undergoing left ventricular catheterization, comprising 13 normal subjects, 13 with coronary artery disease, and 12 with acute myocardial infarction.
C
Comparator
Normal subjects (n=13)
O
Outcome
Myocardial wall stiffness (passive elastic modulus 'a' derived from the pressure-volume relationship)surrogate

Coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction progressively increase left ventricular wall stiffness, and severe stiffness is strongly associated with acute mortality.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.045% vs 0.005%

p-value: p=<0.005

Abstract

The evaluation of left ventricular (LV) compliance by use of the pressure-volume (P-V) relationship encounters several serious difficulties. Since the P-V relationship is curvilinear, it is difficult to quantitate. Furthermore, alterations of resting heart size and geometry also produce marked changes in the P-V curve. The first derivative of the P-V relationship, however, is a precisely linear function expressed by the formula dP/dV = aP+b. The slope of this linear function, a, termed the passive elastic modulus, has been shown to be independent of initial volume and primarily and predominantly determined by changes in the stiffness of the myocardium. Myocardial wall stiffness was evaluated in three groups of subjects during LV catheterization. In 13 normal subjects a = 0.005; in 13 with coronary artery disease a = 0.011; and in 12 with acute infarction a = 0.045. The differences in stiffness among the groups were highly significant ( P < 0.005). It was concluded that a measurable change in ventricular compliance occurs with the development of coronary artery disease and that a further increase in wall stiffness occurs with the development of acute infarction. The magnitude of increase in LV wall stiffness correlated directly with immediate prognosis: 87% of those subjects with a ΔP/ΔV greater than 0.5 mm Hg/cc died of power failure during the acute stage of their illness. These alterations in compliance may invalidate certain traditional concepts of LV function and heart failure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Diamond et al. (1972) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction (n=38). Coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction vs. Normal subjects was evaluated on Myocardial wall stiffness (passive elastic modulus, a) (p=<0.005). Coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction significantly increased myocardial wall stiffness compared to normal subjects (passive elastic modulus 0.011 and 0.045 vs 0.005, P<0.005).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f236704e2b0ba896c970fhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.45.1.11
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systolic and Diastolic Abnormalities of the Left Ventricle in Coronary Artery Disease1970 · 166 citations
  2. 2Studies on Starling's Law of the Heart1960 · 86 citations
  3. 3Studies in clinical shock and hypotension1969 · 101 citations
  4. 4Myocardial Infarction Following Coronary Ligation in Dogs1967 · 113 citations
  5. 5Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction by Echocardiography1971 · 651 citations