Key result
Standard dose IV-tPA was associated with considerably better functional outcomes compared to lower-dose regimens in Asian populations, without increasing symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates.
Why the study?
Does standard-dose IV-tPA improve functional outcomes compared to low-dose IV-tPA without increasing hemorrhage risk in Asian patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Meta-Analysis (n=9,300)
Yes
Does standard-dose IV-tPA improve functional outcomes compared to low-dose IV-tPA without increasing hemorrhage risk in Asian patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Standard dose IV-tPA may provide better functional outcomes than low-dose regimens in Asian patients with acute ischemic stroke without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
Supports standard-dose IV-tPA preference in Asian acute ischemic stroke; challenges prior observational data endorsing low-dose regimens.
BACKGROUND: Data regarding thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in Asia are scarce and only a small percentage of patients are thrombolysed. The dose of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in Asia remains controversial. Case-controlled observation studies in Asia included only Japanese patients and suggested the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose IV-tPA (0.6 mg/kg body weight; max 60 mg) comparable to standard dose (0.9 mg/kg body weight; max. 90 mg). Reduced treatment cost, lower symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk and comparable efficacy encouraged many Asian centers to adopt low-dose or even variable-dose IV-tPA regimens. We evaluated various Asian thrombolysis studies and compared with SITS-MOST registry and NINDS trial. METHODS: We included the published studies on acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis in Asia. Unadjusted relative risks and 95% Confidence intervals were calculated for each study. Pooled estimates from random effects models were used because the tests for heterogeneity were significant. RESULTS: We found only 18 publications regarding acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis in Asia that included total of 9300 patients. Owing to ethnic differences, stroke severity, small number of cases in individual reports, outcome measures and tPA dose regimes, it is difficult to compare these studies. Functional outcomes were almost similar (to Japanese studies) when lower-dose IV-tPA was used in non-Japanese populations across Asia. Interestingly, with standard dose IV-tPA, considerably better functional outcomes were observed, without increasing symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates. CONCLUSIONS: Variable dose regimens of IV-tPA are used across Asia without any reliable or established evidence. Establishing a uniform IV-tPA regimen is essential since the rapid improvements in health-care facilities and public awareness are expected to increase the rates of thrombolysis in Asia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2011) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute ischemic stroke (n=9,300). Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) vs. Standard dose IV-tPA was evaluated on Functional outcomes and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Standard dose IV-tPA was associated with considerably better functional outcomes compared to lower-dose regimens in Asian populations, without increasing symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: