Key result
Therapeutic-dose apixaban and dabigatran had similar major bleeding rates to aspirin, whereas rivaroxaban had higher rates (RD 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI -0.1 to 3.7).
Why the study?
Therapeutic-dose NOACs are superior to aspirin for thromboembolism prevention in several settings, but differences in bleeding risks between NOACs and single antiplatelet therapy required estimation.
Do therapeutic-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) increase bleeding risks compared to single antiplatelet therapy?
Systematic Review (n=26,224)
Do therapeutic-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) increase bleeding risks compared to single antiplatelet therapy?
Effect estimate: RD 0.0 percentage points (apixaban) (95% CI -1.3 to 2.6)
Therapeutic-dose apixaban and dabigatran have similar major bleeding risks to low-dose aspirin, whereas rivaroxaban may be associated with higher bleeding rates.
Supports preferring apixaban or dabigatran over rivaroxaban when adding anticoagulation to aspirin; extends comparative NOAC safety data versus antiplatelet therapy.
BACKGROUND: In several settings, therapeutic-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are superior to aspirin for the prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism. PURPOSE: To estimate differences in bleeding risks between NOACs and single antiplatelet therapy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 2024 without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing therapeutic-dose NOACs versus single antiplatelet therapy, with a minimum treatment duration of 3 months. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was done independently and in duplicate. DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine RCTs with 26 224 participants were included. All studies used aspirin as antiplatelet therapy. Compared with aspirin, apixaban had similar rates of major bleeding (risk difference [RD], 0.0 percentage point [95% CI, -1.3 to 2.6 percentage points]; 5 trials) and intracranial hemorrhage (RD, -0.2 percentage point [CI, -0.6 to 1.4 percentage points]; 5 trials). Compared with aspirin, dabigatran had similar rates of major bleeding (RD, 0.5 percentage point [CI, -2.1 to 19.6 percentage points]; 2 trials) and intracranial hemorrhage (RD, 0.0 percentage point [CI, -1.1 to 24.5 percentage points]; 2 trials). Compared with aspirin, rivaroxaban had higher rates of major bleeding (RD, 0.9 percentage point [CI, -0.1 to 3.7 percentage points]; 2 trials) and intracranial hemorrhage (RD, 0.3 percentage point [CI, -0.1 to 79.7 percentage points]; 2 trials). The evidence certainty ranged from low to moderate. LIMITATION: Confidence intervals were wide and included the possibility of a null effect. CONCLUSION: In this systematic review of RCTs, rates of major bleeding for therapeutic-dose apixaban and dabigatran were similar to those for low-dose aspirin, whereas rates were higher for rivaroxaban. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. (PROSPERO: CRD42024553683).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Arterial and venous thromboembolism (n=26,224). Therapeutic-dose non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) vs. Single antiplatelet therapy (aspirin) was evaluated on Major bleeding (RD 0.0 percentage points (apixaban), 95% CI -1.3 to 2.6). Therapeutic-dose apixaban and dabigatran had similar major bleeding rates to aspirin, whereas rivaroxaban had higher rates (RD 0.9 percentage points; 95% CI -0.1 to 3.7).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: