Why the study?
The association of non-chicken wing left atrial appendage morphology with embolic stroke recurrence was unknown in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source and atrial cardiopathy.
Does non-chicken wing left atrial appendage morphology increase the risk of embolic stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS and atrial cardiopathy compared to chicken wing morphology?
Does non-chicken wing left atrial appendage morphology increase the risk of embolic stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS and atrial cardiopathy compared to chicken wing morphology?
In patients with ESUS and atrial cardiopathy, non-chicken wing LAA morphology on CT is independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent embolic stroke.
Should not yet change ESUS management; leaves open whether LAA morphology refines recurrence prediction or therapy.
Background: The left atrial appendage (LAA) is a major source of thrombus and non-chicken wing (CW). LAA morphology is a risk factor for embolic events in atrial fibrillation. However, the association of non-CW morphology with embolic stroke recurrence is unknown in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) and atrial cardiopathy. Methods: We conducted retrospective analyses using a prospective institutional stroke registry (2013–2017). Patients with ESUS and atrial cardiopathy were enrolled. Atrial cardiopathy was diagnosed if an increased left atrial diameter (>40 mm, men; >38 mm, women), supraventricular tachycardia, or LAA filling defect on computed tomography (CT) were present. Patients admitted >24 h after onset were excluded. LAA morphology was evaluated using CT and categorized into CW vs. non-CW types. The primary outcome was embolic stroke recurrence. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the independent association between LAA morphology and outcome. Results: Of 157 patients, 81 (51.6%) had CW LAA morphology. The median follow-up was 41.5 (interquartile range 12.3–58.5) months corresponding to 509.8 patient years. In total, 18 participants experienced embolic stroke recurrences (3.80 per 100 patient-years). Non-CW morphology was more associated with embolic stroke recurrence than CW morphology (hazard ratio (HR), 3.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13–8.91; p = 0.029). After adjusting for CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and number of potential embolic sources, non-CW morphology showed an independent association with outcome (adjusted HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.02–8.23; p = 0.045). Conclusions: The LAA morphology types may help identify high risk of embolic stroke recurrence in ESUS with atrial cardiopathy. LAA morphology in atrial cardiopathy may provide clues for developing therapies tailored to specific mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gwak et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: