Key result
Telemedicine did not significantly improve 18-month systolic blood pressure compared to usual care for patients living ≥30 miles (difference -0.80 mm Hg; 95% CI -6.6 to 5.1) or <30 miles away.
Why the study?
Does a telemedicine intervention improve 18-month systolic blood pressure in veterans with hypertension, and does travel distance to primary care matter?
Observational (n=503)
Does a telemedicine intervention improve 18-month systolic blood pressure in veterans with hypertension, and does travel distance to primary care matter?
Effect estimate: Difference -0.80 mm Hg (95% CI -6.6 to 5.1)
A telemedicine intervention did not significantly improve 18-month systolic blood pressure compared to usual care, regardless of the patient's travel distance to primary care.
Telemedicine confers no SBP advantage by distance in veterans; leaves open efficacy in randomized or broader populations.
Although telemedicine may help overcome geographic access barriers, it is unknown whether rural patients receive greater benefits. In a secondary analysis of 503 veterans participating in a hypertension telemedicine study, the authors hypothesized that patients with greater travel distances would have greater improvements in 18-month systolic blood pressure (SBP). Patients were categorized by telemedicine exposure and travel distance to primary care, derived from zip codes. Comparisons were (1) usual care (UC), distance <30 miles (reference); (2) UC, distance ≥30 miles; (3) telemedicine, distance <30 miles; (4) telemedicine, distance ≥30 miles. Compared with patients receiving UC, distance <30 miles (intercept=127.7), no difference in 18-month SBP was observed in patients receiving UC, distance ≥30 miles (0.13 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [-6.6 to 6.8]); telemedicine, distance <30 miles (-1.1 mm Hg [-7.3 to 5.2]); telemedicine, distance ≥30 miles (-0.80 mm Hg [-6.6 to 5.1]). Although telemedicine may help overcome geographic access barriers, additional studies are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowen et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=503). Telemedicine vs. Usual care was evaluated on 18-month systolic blood pressure (SBP) (Difference -0.80 mm Hg, 95% CI -6.6 to 5.1). Telemedicine did not significantly improve 18-month systolic blood pressure compared to usual care for patients living ≥30 miles (difference -0.80 mm Hg; 95% CI -6.6 to 5.1) or <30 miles away.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: