Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Co-rumination can significantly affect well-being yet remains understudied in adult romantic relationships. We aimed to examine how corumination in adult couples impacts two forms of emotional distress (anxiety and depression) and relationship satisfaction over a 15-20 week follow-up. We also investigated whether effects persisted when controlling important covariates (e.g., emotional stability) and explored gender differences. Methods: Longitudinal path analyses were used to analyze data from 960 romantic couples (M age = 38.3, SD = 6.77 years) recruited through Qualtrics Survey Panels and homeschooling groups. Couples completed two survey waves during Winter/Spring 2021. Each partner completed measures of co-rumination at baseline, and of depression, anxiety, relationship satisfaction, and emotional stability at baseline and follow-up. Results: Dyadic co-rumination predicted significant increases in both emotional distress measures, but not relationship satisfaction, at follow-up when controlling baseline levels. Effects persisted when controlling covariates. While co-rumination predicted significant increases in depression in women but not men, formal tests of gender moderation were non-significant. No evidence of gender differences was found for co-rumination predicting anxiety or relationship satisfaction. Discussion: Results suggest couples should be counseled to limit coruminative discussions to minimize emotional distress. Reducing adult couples’ co-rumination is unlikely to lessen relationship satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whitewolf et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: