Why the study?
Pre-interventional reperfusion is a potential benefit of IVT before MT, but there are few data comparing its occurrence between patients randomized to IVT or no IVT before MT.
Does intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy improve pre-interventional reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions?
Does intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy improve pre-interventional reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions?
Intravenous thrombolysis prior to mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients increases the rate of pre-interventional reperfusion by an absolute 6% compared to thrombectomy alone.
May support pre-interventional reperfusion before MT in LVO; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: A potential benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is pre-interventional reperfusion. Currently, there are few data on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion in patients randomized to IVT or no IVT before MT. METHODS: SWIFT DIRECT (Solitaire With the Intention For Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous t-PA vs DIRECT Solitaire Stent-retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke) was a randomized controlled trial including acute ischemic stroke IVT eligible patients being directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center, with allocation to IVT with MT versus MT alone. The primary endpoint of this analysis was the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion, defined as a pre-interventional expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of ≥2a. The effect of IVT and potential treatment effect heterogeneity were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 396 patients, pre-interventional reperfusion occurred in 20 (10.0%) patients randomized to IVT with MT, and in 7 (3.6%) patients randomized to MT alone. Receiving IVT favored the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion (adjusted OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.87). There was no IVT treatment effect heterogeneity on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion with different strata of Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time (p for interaction=0.33), although the effect tended to be stronger in patients with a Randomization-to-Groin-Puncture time >28 min (adjusted OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.16 to 18.68). There were no significant differences in rates of functional outcomes between patients with and without pre-interventional reperfusion. CONCLUSION: Even for patients with proximal large vessel occlusions and direct access to MT, IVT resulted in an absolute increase of 6% in rates of pre-interventional reperfusion. The influence of time strata on the occurrence of pre-interventional reperfusion should be studied further in an individual patient data meta-analysis of comparable trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03192332.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mujanović et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: