Key result
Past hypertensive disorders of pregnancy linked to ~5-fold higher hypertension risk versus gestational diabetes alone.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the incidence of hypertension and blood pressure phenotypes using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in women with past pregnancy complications attending a Women's Heart Clinic.
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and management at a specialized Women's Heart Clinic improve detection and control of hypertension in women with past pregnancy complications?
Observational (n=156)
No
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and management at a specialized Women's Heart Clinic improve detection and control of hypertension in women with past pregnancy complications?
Effect estimate: adjusted-OR 5.26 (95% CI 1.07-32.76)
p-value: p=0.05
Women with past hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have a high incidence of hypertension that can be effectively detected with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring and managed in a specialized Women's Heart Clinic.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of hypertension and blood pressure (BP) phenotypes using 24-hour ambulatory BP (24hr-ABP) in women with past pregnancy complications who were recruited into a Women's Heart Clinic (WHC). STUDY DESIGN: We recruited 156 women aged 30-55 years with past hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and/or gestational diabetes (GDM) to a multidisciplinary six-month WHC that provided cardiovascular risk management in Melbourne, Australia. Women were referred for 24 hr-ABP monitoring if clinic BP was ≥130/80 mmHg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was incident hypertension, defined by 24 hr-ABP monitoring as daytime hypertension ≥135/85 mmHg, nocturnal hypertension ≥120/70 mmHg, and/or 24hr-average hypertension ≥130/80 mmHg. RESULTS: From 156 women, 54 women underwent 24hr-ABP monitoring (mean age 41.3 ± 4.5 years; 3.9 ± 2.6 years post-partum), with 64.8 % HDP and 45.2 % GDM. Incidence of hypertension was 61.1 % [95 % CI 48.2 %-74.0 %]. Higher proportion of women with past HDP had daytime hypertension compared to those with GDM only (57.1 % vs. 26.3 %; p = 0.05) and higher nocturnal mean systolic-BP [116.0 ± 11.2 mmHg vs. 109.6 ± 8.7 mmHg; p = 0.04]. Women with HDP had increased odds of hypertension [adjusted-OR 5.26 95 % CI (1.07-32.76); p = 0.05]. Following management at the WHC, women diagnosed with hypertension had significantly improved BP control (6.1 % at baseline vs. 75.8 % at six-month follow-up; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women with past HDP had five-fold increased incidence of hypertension, with higher daytime hypertension and nocturnal systolic-BP, compared to women with GDM. After attending WHC, BP control significantly improved. Our findings suggest routine postpartum follow-up with 24hr-ABP monitoring, through a WHC, may be useful in early detection and management of hypertension in these women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pant et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Past hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and/or gestational diabetes (n=156). 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and Women's Heart Clinic management vs. Gestational diabetes only (for HDP comparison) was evaluated on Incident hypertension, defined by 24 hr-ABP monitoring as daytime hypertension ≥135/85 mmHg, nocturnal hypertension ≥120/70 mmHg, and/or 24hr-average hypertension ≥130/80 mmHg (adjusted-OR 5.26, 95% CI 1.07-32.76, p=0.05). Women with past hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had increased odds of incident hypertension compared to those with gestational diabetes only (adjusted-OR 5.26; 95% CI 1.07-32.76; p=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: