PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 27, 2009Journal of Educational Psychology708 citations

Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students?

View Full Paper
HJHyungshim JangJRJohnmarshall ReeveRRRichard M. Ryan

Key Points

  • The research investigates whether self-determination theory can explain the learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students, particularly focusing on autonomy and psychological needs.
  • Four studies conducted with high school students in South Korea
  • Study 1 examined links between autonomy, competence, and relatedness and learning satisfaction
  • Study 3 employed structural equation modeling to assess outcome influences, controlling for cultural factors
  • Higher experiences of autonomy and competence correlated with satisfying learning outcomes
  • Psychological need satisfaction linked to increased achievement and intrinsic motivation
  • Cultural and parental influences minimally impacted the hypothesized model's effectiveness

Abstract

Recognizing recent criticisms concerning the cross-cultural generalizability of self-determination theory (SDT), the authors tested the SDT view that high school students in collectivistically oriented South Korea benefit from classroom experiences of autonomy support and psychological need satisfaction. In Study 1, experiences of autonomy, competence, and relatedness underlaid Korean students’ most satisfying learning experiences, and experiences of low autonomy and low competence underlaid their least satisfying learning experiences. In Study 2, psychological need satisfaction experiences were associated with productive (achievement and engagement) and satisfying (intrinsic motivation and proneness to negative affect) student outcomes. Study 3 replicated and extended Study 2’s structural equation modeling findings by showing that the hypothesized model explained students’ positive outcomes even after controlling for cultural and parental influences, including the collectivistic value orientation. Study 4 replicated the earlier cross-sectional findings with a semester-long prospective 3-wave design. The authors discuss how the findings support the motivation theory’s cross-cultural generalizability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jang et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f33c94994b59e77426e86https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper