Key result
Edaravone produces no clinically meaningful QT prolongation at therapeutic or supratherapeutic doses.
Why the study?
Does edaravone at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses cause QT/QTc interval prolongation in healthy subjects?
RCT (n=27)
Single-blind
3-way crossover
No
Does edaravone at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses cause QT/QTc interval prolongation in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: Slope 0.000155 ms/(ng/mL) (95% CI -0.000021 to 0.000332)
p-value: p=0.1478
Edaravone does not cause clinically meaningful QT prolongation even at supratherapeutic doses, supporting its cardiovascular safety profile.
Supports edaravone use without QT monitoring; confirms no concentration-dependent QTc effects in this RCT.
This randomized, single-blind, 3-way crossover study assessed the effect of edaravone on QT interval, including an exposure-response analysis. Twenty-seven healthy Japanese male volunteers, aged 20 to 49 years, were randomly assigned to receive a single intravenous dose of each treatment in 1 of 3 sequences (n = 9 each): ACB, BAC, and CBA, where A was edaravone 60 mg (therapeutic dose), B was edaravone 300 mg (supratherapeutic dose), and C was normal saline (placebo). Electrocardiographs were collected to assess treatment effects. In an exposure-response analysis, a linear model was determined to be valid and indicated no statistically significant positive slope for the relationship between change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF) and edaravone concentration (0.000155 ms/(ng/mL); P = .1478); upper bounds of 2-sided 90% confidence intervals after placebo adjustment (ΔΔQTcF) were <10 milliseconds at the geometric mean maximum concentration for each edaravone dose. Overall estimated values by time point of ΔΔQTcF ≤0.9 milliseconds, no outlier values, and no morphologic changes suggestive of repolarization abnormalities were observed. Analysis of heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration also revealed no adverse findings. These data indicate that edaravone, even at supratherapeutic doses, does not produce clinically meaningful QT prolongation and has no clinically relevant cardiac effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=27). Edaravone vs. Placebo (normal saline) was evaluated on Placebo-adjusted change from baseline in QTcF (ΔΔQTcF) as a function of edaravone concentration (Slope 0.000155 ms/(ng/mL), 95% CI -0.000021 to 0.000332, p=0.1478). Edaravone at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses did not produce clinically meaningful QT prolongation, showing no significant positive slope for the relationship between ΔΔQTcF and concentration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: