Key result
Treatment at high-volume primary PCI hospitals significantly reduced the risk of in-hospital mortality compared to low-volume hospitals in patients with acute myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 0.66).
Why the study?
Does primary PCI at high-volume hospitals reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=8,391)
Yes
Does primary PCI at high-volume hospitals reduce in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: OR 0.66 (95% CI 0.47-0.93)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.9% vs 7%
p-value: p=0.016
Higher hospital primary PCI volume is independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality and shorter length of stay for patients with acute myocardial infarction in Japan.
May support regionalizing primary PCI to high-volume centers; extends observational data but leaves causality and practice change open.
BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important treatment option for patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Although an inverse association between a hospital's PCI volume and in-hospital mortality has been observed in Western studies, previous Japanese investigations have not found any such relationship. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis of 8,391 cases of acute MI, obtained from administrative data from 2006. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on the number of PCI procedures per half-year (6-13, 14-22, 23-38, 39-134) and mortality rates were compared across the groups. Crude-mortality in the lowest-volume quartile was 7.0%, compared with 4.9% in the highest-volume quartile. An inverse association was found between primary PCI procedure volume and crude in-hospital mortality (P = 0.016). After case-mix adjustment, a significant decrease in mortality risk for patients treated at high-volume (3rd and 4th quartile) hospitals compared to the lowest-volume (1(st) quartile) hospitals was found. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this administrative data, there is an inverse association between a hospital's primary PCI volume and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute MI. Periodic outcomes research is necessary in conjunction with progress in PCI practice and technology to establish the recommended PCI volume and regionalization for improvements in care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuwabara et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=8,391). High hospital primary PCI volume (4th quartile: 39-134 procedures/half-year) vs. Low hospital primary PCI volume (1st quartile: 6-13 procedures/half-year) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93, p=0.016). Treatment at high-volume primary PCI hospitals significantly reduced the risk of in-hospital mortality compared to low-volume hospitals in patients with acute myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 0.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: