Key result
Primary PCI performed by junior cardiologists resulted in a similar 30-day clinical success rate (95.7% vs 92.2%, p=0.4079) compared to experienced cardiologists in patients with STEMI.
Why the study?
Does primary PCI performed by junior cardiologists compared to experienced cardiologists result in worse in-hospital outcomes for patients with STEMI?
Observational (n=121)
No
Does primary PCI performed by junior cardiologists compared to experienced cardiologists result in worse in-hospital outcomes for patients with STEMI?
Primary PCI for STEMI can be safely performed by junior cardiologists with acceptable clinical outcomes when supported by experienced operators, though hospital stays may be slightly longer.
Junior cardiologists may perform supervised primary PCI in STEMI with acceptable outcomes; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) results in dramatically improved clinical outcomes when performed in a timely manner. Although guidelines for STEMI patients recommend PCI should be performed by experienced operators with acceptable PCI volume, cardiologists in a local area must perform primary PCI at their own hospitals. This study evaluated the effects of cardiologist experience on outcomes for STEMI patients in a local area in Japan.Between April 2007 and March 2010, 140 consecutive STEMI patients were admitted to our hospital and 121 of these patients received primary PCI. STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were divided into two groups according to the operator's experience as a cardiologist. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical backgrounds, PCI findings, in-hospital outcomes, and drug administration at discharge.There were no significant differences in any clinical characteristics, angiographic findings, or PCI procedures between the two groups. Clinical outcomes of the two groups were similar, except for the length of hospital stay (21.1 ± 5.8 versus 15.5 ± 9.7; P = 0.0255). The frequency of administration of drugs such as β-blockers (59.1% versus 34.0%; P = 0.0086), aldosterone blockade (10.4% versus 25.5%; P = 0.0334), and nicorandil (76.1% versus 25.5%; P = < 0.0001) was different between the two groups.The clinical outcomes of STEMI patients in this study were satisfactory and almost equivalent when compared according to the experience of the attending cardiologist. The present findings suggest the important clinical implication that younger cardiologists who have experienced PCI procedures to a certain extent can safely perform primary PCI and contribute to better prognoses of STEMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nomura et al. (2011) conducted an observational in ST-Elevated Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (n=121). Primary PCI by junior cardiologists (2-4 years experience) vs. Primary PCI by experienced cardiologists (>5 years experience) was evaluated on 30-day clinical success (p=0.4079). Primary PCI performed by junior cardiologists resulted in a similar 30-day clinical success rate (95.7% vs 92.2%, p=0.4079) compared to experienced cardiologists in patients with STEMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: